posted by user: JensOlesen || 2032 views || tracked by 3 users: [display]

MANCEPT 2013 : Methods in Political Theory (MANCEPT Workshop)

FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle

Link: http://manceptworkshops2013.wordpress.com/workshops-a-n/methods-in-practice/
 
When Sep 4, 2013 - Sep 6, 2013
Where Manchester
Submission Deadline Jun 14, 2013
Notification Due Jun 15, 2013
Final Version Due Aug 24, 2013
Categories    political theory   methods   history of political thought   hermeneutics
 

Call For Papers

Methods in Political Theory


During the 1960s and 70s the methodological orthodoxy of enquiries into the study of political thought became the target of historical critique. Dissatisfied with analyses that masqueraded as historical theses, critics proposed alternative procedures they believed were more appropriate to interpretations of canonical texts. In reaction to the critique, political theorists turned inward, reflecting on the problem of how the canon should be reconstructed, thereby following in the footsteps of neighbouring disciplines such as philosophy and history, where hermeneutical issues had already been subjected to systematic investigation. Rather than trying to generate approaches distinctive to their enterprise, political theorists either ‘imported’ insights from the latter disciplines or expressed their aversion toward methodological debates.

This reluctance to talk about method has not changed much since. Indeed, some theorists consider methodological discussions as nothing but ‘continental’ charade. Aversion towards methodological debates is often based on the underlying assumption that we all know not only what we do, but also how we do it. Thus, questions of method are either bracketed out completely, or dealt with only in introductory chapters in order to engage with ‘more substantive’ issues. Yet method and substance are only analytically distinct: the way in which theorists choose to interpret a text is inextricably linked to the outcome of their analyses.

Abstracts of up to 500 words are requested for papers that aspire to discuss the term ‘method’ with reference to political theorizing, and/or to address one or more of the following approaches:

• ‘Methods’ of Textual Interpretation (for instance, Skinner, Strauss, Gadamer, Ricoeur, Derrida, Althusser)

• Genealogy (Nietzsche, Foucault)

• Conceptual history (Koselleck, Ball)

• Comparative Political Theory (Dallmayr, Godrej et al.)

• Gender Theory and Feminist ‘Interventions’ (Butler, Fraser)

• Critical Theory (Adorno, Horkheimer, Habermas, Honneth)

• Deliberative democracy (Habermas, Benhabib) or Agonistic Pluralism (Mouffe, Honig, Connolly, Rancière)

• ‘Original Position’ (Rawls)

• Ideal vs. Non-Ideal Theory

• Studies of Ideology (Freeden, van Dijk)

• Marx and Marxian Political Theory

Please submit your abstract, along with your name and institutional affiliation to jens.olesen@politics.ox.ac.uk. Abstracts will be accepted on a rolling basis. The deadline for submissions is Friday 14 June 2013.

Panel Convenor:

Jens Olesen (Oxford/LSE)

Related Resources

JMC 2022   JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CRYPTOLOGY
ISIR-eCom 2022   INTERACTIVE AND SCALABLE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL METHODS FOR ECOMMERCE ((conjunction with WSDM 2022)
VISAPP 2022   17th International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications
ICFEM 2022   23th International Conference on Formal Engineering Methods
ICoCTA 2022   2022 3rd International Conference on Control Theory and Applications (ICoCTA 2022)
DeLTA 2022   3rd International Conference on Deep Learning Theory and Applications
CONCUR 2022   International Conference on Concurrency Theory
ICSEA 2022   The Seventeenth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances
FMICS 2022   International Conference on Formal Methods for Industrial Critical Systems
DSAA 2022   9th IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics